The March 2nd brief finds that if a state cuts a tax, it generally has to make an offsetting cut to expenditures for a program or service in order to maintain balance. This spending cut is likely to reduce demand in the state just as much as the reduction in taxes may stimulate demand.[1] It is at best a zero-sum game, where the gains in one area are offset by the losses in another. Given states’ balanced budget requirements, neither a broad-based tax cut nor a jobs credit can do much to increase overall economic activity in the state. This tax brief is a good companion to the February 16th CBPP brief A Balanced Approach to Closing State Deficits used in connection with ANCOR's February 18th Audio Conference.
CBPP also released on March 3rd an update on state budget cuts. The report found 45 states making cuts that are harmful to vulnerable populations.



